Wednesday, May 13, 2015

How safe is our meat supply? 4th Quarter USH Research-Issues & Perspectives; 1945-2000

  Although the food supply in the United States is safer than it used to be, food-borne disease still remains a public health problem, resulting in seventy six million cases a year. In 1906, the Congress passed the Meat and Inspection Act, because of Upton Sinclair’s book, The Jungle. Sinclair’s work really portrayed the disease ridden, unsanitary Chicago slaughterhouse, which started the United States Department of Agriculture requirements for “more sanitary” conditions. The term E. coli came from the hamburgers served by the Jack in the Box restaurant chain in late 1992. Throughout Washington, Idaho, California, and Nevada there was a result of 722 cases, 171 hospitalizations, and 4 deaths from the hamburgers served. Since the establishment of the Food and Drug Administration, government policy makers have not always protected consumers from tainted or unsafe products, and have not always made sure labels accurately reflect the content of packaging; a product labeled “ground beef” contains more than just ground beef.
       After the Jack in the Box outbreak, Americans started becoming more aware of the sanitary of the beef they consumed. In 2007, 33.4 million pounds of beef was recalled in the United States because of bacteria such as E. coli and Salmonella. The United States Department of Agriculture says they "protect consumers from the dangers of E. coli contamination by adopting a zero tolerance policy for six additional strains; E. coli 026, 045, 0103, 0111, 0121, and 145 of the pathogens in raw beef" (USDA). The USDA estimates to prevent nearly 25,00 food-borne illnesses yearly. Until the twentieth century, food safety was responsible for state and local. Now, the FDA of the Department of Health and Humans Services and FSIS of USDA have responsibility for our food supply. The FSIS has inspection for meat, and is supposed to inspect the animal before and after slaughter.    
    In 2009, The New York Times featured a story about 22 year old, Stephanie Smith. Smith started with cramps and aches, leading to bloody diarrhea, shut down of the kidneys, and then seizures. After being put into a coma for nine weeks, waking up incapable of walking, and paralyzed, investigation led back to hamburgers her mother grilled. I found this source especially useful, because it is something I can relate to. My parents grill hamburgers all the time for my family and guest, and it is terrifying to think that one of us could wake up in a coma, or paralyzed. The hamburger was from the popular food brand Cargill. Little did Smith know these hamburgers labeled “American Chef’s Selection Angus Beef Patties” were filled with E. coli. The contamination occurs when a cow’s intestinal or fecal matter comes into contact with muscle meat during unsanitary slaughter. Smiths’ hamburger was half fat, half meat, making it the cheapest meat for 60 cents a pound. Over the past three years, ground beef has caused 16 outbreaks leading to the recall of ground beef from 3,000 grocery stores.
    I was shocked to learn that ground beef is not only meat, but sometimes meat not only from different parts of the cow, but also different slaughter houses. Records prove the patty Smith consumed was made with trimmings in a slaughterhouse mixed with mush scraps from Wisconsin. Ingredients were from slaughterhouses in Nebraska, Texas, and Uruguay. These slaughterhouses use ammonia to kill bacteria in the fat trimmings. Cargill thinks the suppliers check for E. coli, but the trimmings of this cow are prone to have contact with feces, which contain E. coli. All the USDA did was encourage them to test the ingredients better first. The USDA says they "began testing additional components of ground beef and issued new instructions to employees asking that they they verify that plants follow sanitary practices in processing beef carcasses" (USDA). The USDA also said they were requiring labels so buyers will know if the meat contains additives, but the government is accepting that additives in meat is a “trade secret” allowing Cargill to sell the beef without labeling the additives.
     On March 12, 2012, ABC featured an announcement of “pink slime”. Pink slime is a cheap filler in 70 percent of ground beef, sold at the grocery store and 25 percent of every American hamburger.  Kit Foshee is a corporate quality assurance manager at a company that makes pink slime, Beef Products Inc. Foshee says,  “It looks like play dough..its pink and frozen, it’s not what the typical person would consider meat” (Foshee). The trimmings come from the most contaminated parts of the cow, once used only in dog food and cooking oil. The USDA says it is safe to eat, because “BPI’s trimmings simmering them in low heat, separating fat and tissue using a centrifuge, and spraying them with ammonia gas kills germs” (USDA). Consumers began to worry about the meat they were consuming, but the USDA agreed that lean, finely textured beef is safe. Grocery stores such as Publix, Star Market, Walmart, Sams Club, and Kroger started carrying beef that does not contain LFTB, because people did not feel safe to consume meat containing pink slime. After the incident of pink slime in 2012, it made a comeback in 2014, but was not as heard of as it was in 2012. After the ABC News special on the additive, BPI went down from nearly 5.5 million pounds a week to now producing one million pounds a week.
    The USDA dictates what is labeled on the packaging of ground beef. "The USDA regulates meat and poultry in the US, ensuring all meat and poultry for commercial sale is produced with government inspectors present. As a result of weak regulations and lack of control over meat companies, the USDA has still failed to effectively safeguard the US meat supply, creating an ongoing threat to consumer health" (Grace Communications Foundation).  "The HACCP system allows inspection to be done by the meat companies themselves, reducing the involvement of USDA inspectors. The major problem with this is meat companies are not going to stop production to take care of contaminated meat.  Under the HACCP, the USDA discouraged inspectors from stopping the production line if there is any suspicion of contamination, because it slows down the process of the production line. The USDA cannot demand the recall of meat, but can talk with the company, letting them deal with the problem on their own. The USDA cannot shut down an organization if it does not meet sanitation requirements. In 2002, Public Citizen and the Government Accountability Project discovered that after a facility tested positive for Salmonella, the ground beef processing organization was allowed to sell the ground beef for several months before cleaning up the facilities" (Grace Communications Foundation). 
   The FDA and USDA say they protect consumers from the dangers of bacteria in raw meat, but really the USDA is not labeling additives because the government agrees it is a “trade secret”. Although I knew there might be something in my food that was not healthy, I did not know that the label did not have everything on it. I love to eat, but now I am scared if I eat a burger it could contain pink slime. Or, in even worse cases, I am now scared I could be paralyzed from eating a cheeseburger. The FDA takes years to act upon dangerous bacteria in food. Out of the 11,000 employees in the FDA, only four people at headquarters check food labels.
     



-I used this site to learn that there are 76 million cases a year of food-borne disease. I also used this site to learn about the 2007 incident of more than 20 beef recalls (33.4 million pounds) in the United States. This site was valuable, but I did not use much of the information from it throughout my paper.

-I only used this site for one sentence of my paper. I did not like the set up of this website, but I was taught about Upton Sinclair’s book, The Jungle, and how it started the USDA requirements for more sanitary conditions.

-This was a government based website, so I knew the majority of it would be leaning towards the side of what people want to hear instead of what is true. From this site, I learned how the USDA is said to protect consumers from the dangers of E. coli by a zero tolerance policy for six strands. This site was very helpful, teaching me a lot about the USDA. For example, how the USDA estimates 25,000 food-borne illnesses yearly. I learned about the “test and hold” policy and how the USDA is requiring labels so buyers will know if meat contains additives, but I used information from a non-governmental site to state how the USDA is failing on labeling additives. I used information from this site all throughout my paper, disagreeing with it.

-This website was also a government run website. I used the information about how the FSIS has inspection for meat, poultry and egg products. FDA has responsibility over the rest of the food supply. I also learned and used in paper that until they 20th century, food safety was responsible for state and local, and in 1906 congress passed the meat and inspection act.

-This website was very reliable, because it is from ABC News. I used the facts about Pink Slime in 70 percent of ground beef sold at the grocery store and 25% of every American hamburger. I also used the quote from Kit Foshee, a manager at a company that sells pink slime. The USDA said its safe to eat, because ammonia kills the bacteria. I used many facts from this reliable source all throughout my paper.

-This source was another reliable ABC News article. After learning about the nasty “play dough” like mush added into ground beef, I wanted to make sure I was not consuming that. This website stated that the USDA agreed LFTB was safe to eat, but grocery stored stopped carrying it.

-I really did not use much from this website except for the fact that pink slime made a comeback in 2014.


-This website was the most interesting website that I researched. After learning about Stephanie Smiths E. coli contamination, leaving her in a 9-week coma and paralyzed, makes me never want to eat a hamburger again.  I was frightened to learn how ground beef is not just meat but usually meat from different parts of the cow and different slaughterhouses. It was absolutely nasty that her “American Chef’s Angus Beef Patties” was made with trimmings in a slaughterhouse mixed with mush from scraps in Wisconsin, using ammonia to kill bacteria. After reading this terrifying story, I never want to eat a burger again. I dedicated an entire paragraph to this story.  

-This site was used in my introduction. I added the number of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths from the Jack in the Box E. coli outbreak. The site went into detail on E. coli, but I stuck to my topic.

-I used this site to learn more about meat inspection. This website explained in depth how the USDA regulates meat in the United States, and ensures that the meat is safe and produced with government inspectors present. Resulting in weak regulations and lack of control over meat companies, the USDA has still failed to effectively make sure the US meat supply is safe. The HACCP system allows inspection to be done by the meat companies themselves, reducing the involvement of USDA inspectors. This website proved to me how the USDA does not fulfill all the things they say they do.





Number of deaths a year from 1996-2009 from E.coli. 

This play dough looking putty is actually pink slime. This cheap filler is placed into ground beef, labeled lean finely textured beef. 
This is Stephanie Smith, the young lady who ate the Cargill hamburger filled with E. coli, leaving her in a 9-week coma, then paralyzed.  

These are the beginning signs of E. coli, now every time I have any of these pains, I will be paranoid.



This an example of a slaughterhouse with all of the cows lined up. 




Thursday, April 30, 2015

Cinderella Man

            A movie takes you to a place where you can feel pain, sorrow and happiness. Movies visually show you, instead of telling you. Being a visual learner, watching a movie is the most effective way for me to actually realize the scenario. Although there may be some historical inaccuracies within every movie, it is exaggerated to prove a point. My class watched Cinderella Man, learning about the fight through the Great Depression. I learned quite a bit about life in America during the Great Depression just from watching the film, Cinderella Man.
            Cinderella Man, directed by Ron Howard, was based on a true story about James J. Braddock fighting through the Great Depression in the 1930s. James J. Braddock started out as a well off man, fighting for his family and himself. As the economy went down, and the Great Depression started coming in at full force, Braddock had to sell everything. The film did an outstanding job at displaying what a normal living condition was like in the 1930s. Previewing the Braddock’s house as a two bedroom, run down shack. Braddock did everything he could to keep his family in a decent standard of living, fighting with a broken hand. I did not realize the Great Depression had hit every family the way it did, until it showed Braddock giving his daughter his only piece of ham, and his wife watering down the milk. I felt the depression hit my heart as I watched his little girl beg for more food. When Braddock got asked to stop boxing, because his last fight was not entreating to the audience, he was not going to give up. Jim started going to the Docks to work. The film showed me how hard men were willing to fight and work during the Great Depression.
            When the electricity got cut off at the Braddock’s house, Jimmy knew he had to do something. The film showed me how harsh these times were, because Jim did something nobody ever expected him to do. He went to the government relief office to get money. Then, Madison Square Garden, getting money from the official’s, just so he could turn the electricity back on. I felt the pain for the poor little children, as the home filled with cold air. I could literally feel myself shaking when I saw the children’s breath come out like smoke every time they took a breath. I felt empathy when the little boy felt like his family was in such debt, that he needed to steal food. It showed how even the youngest of kids knew how poor their conditions were. The daughter sees her mother and father faced with so much adversity, but never giving up. It shows under hard times, there can be good that comes from it. 
            When Braddock is unsure of his fight against Max Baer, the man who killed two men, he is then reminded of his family and how much he is willing to fight for them. The time period is so awful, that Braddock is willing to fight anyone to get the cash for his family. The film is accurate showing the details of the housing, boxing ring, cars, and clothing. Some historical inaccuracy is seen through Max Baer. The director exaggerated Baer to prove the point that he really was a bad man and Braddock should win. During the fight, Braddock has visions of his family, forcing him to fight even harder, winning him the victory. The film taught me how men would do anything just to get money during this time.
            Cinderella Man taught me that life in America during the Great Depression was gruesome, hard, bloody, and depressing. Cinderella Man is defiantly one of my favorite movies and I enjoyed watching the film, rather than reading a text about the Great Depression. I learned a lot about the time period, such as “Hooverville,” debt, government relief offices, and boxing.






Thursday, March 12, 2015

Civil Rights Institute Field Trip in Bham

       I enjoyed visiting the 16th Street Baptist Church. Seeing the Church in person is much more valuable to me, than just reading about it. I liked hearing the speech from the volunteer, and all of his advice. I thought it would be one of those boring 2 hour long speeches, but he actually caught my attention. I am a visual learner, so seeing the church in person was very intriguing. Being able to sit where all the African Americans sat during the Civil Rights movement and hear about the bombs made it feel more realistic to me. My favorite thing in the church was the stained glass of Jesus. I had learned about the bombing that killed the four girls in the bathroom before I visited the church. Being where they were made my heart feel even worse for those little girls. I enjoyed the church and I would love to go back.
      The Civil Rights Institute changed my perspective on the Civil Rights Movement. We hear about how black people were punished, thrown around, and mistreated everyday. I did not truly realize how sickening it was until I was walking through the Institute, and seeing real live scenes from the Movement. The KKK outfit specifically caught my eye. I have learned about the KKK, but seeing the uniform and burnt cross in person frightened me beyond belief. The Institute helped me see the actual segregation and abuse going on back in the day. It made me very happy that that segregation was over. I do not enjoy sitting in a classroom and reading the same thing over and over and watching videos, so this trip was great for me. I would defiantly recommend this trip to anyone.


Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Questions about World War I

1. When did World War I (The Great War) begin, and why? (What was the immediate cause?) Between what two groups of allies was it fought? Give the name and member countries for each of the opposing sides.
         -World War I began on July 28, 1914. The immediate cause was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand (the archduke of Austria-Hungary) in 1914. His death at the hands of Gavrilo Princip propelled the major European military powers towards war. World War I began as a local war between Austria-Hungary and Siberia. Shortly, it grew into a war involving 32 countries. Allies included Britain, France, Russia, Italy, and the United States. These countries found against the Central powers which included Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria.

Link


2. When and why did the US enter the war?
         -US entered WWI on April 6, 1917. Joined its allies, Britain, France and Russia to fight. Under command of Major General John J. Pershing more than 2 million soldiers fought on France battlefields. Disagreements in europe over territory came to a head with the assassination of the archduke. Exactly one month later war broke out.

Link

3. When and why did World War I come to and end?
          -The final allied push towards the German boarders began on October 17, 1918. As the British, French, and American armies advanced, the alliance between the Central powers began to collapse. Turkey signed an armistice at the end of October, and Austria-Hungary followed.

Link

4. What were the terms of the major agreement ending the war? Why did the US not ratify this treaty, even though President Wilson had played such a major role in negotiating it?
      -US didnt sign The Treaty of Versailles, because it objected to its terms.
             1.   Germany had to accept the Blame for starting the war (Clause 231).  This was vital because it provided the justification for...
2.   Germany had to pay £6,600 million (called Reparations) for the damage done during the war.
3.   Germany was forbidden to have submarines or an air force.   She could have a navy of only six battleships, and an Army of just 100,000 men.   In addition, Germany was not allowed to place any troops in the Rhineland, the strip of land, 50 miles wide, next to France.
4.   Germany lost Territory (land) in Europe (see map, below). Germany’s colonies were given to Britain and France.

5. Come up with a question of your own. What would you like to know? What do the facts about World War I make you wonder?
      -What was the total number of deaths at the end of World War I?



Wednesday, February 4, 2015

3rd Quarter Research Project

            Safety in the workplace was not something that people worried about before the birth of industrialization. When hundreds of young women died due to the Triangle Fire, the public began to demand some reforms. A dropped match on the 8th floor of Triangle Shirtwaist Factory sparked a fire that killed over a hundred people locked inside. Private industry of American factory would never be the same.
The Triangle Waist Company was a factory in the heart of Manhattan, at 23-29 Washington Place, at the Northern corner of Washington Square East. In New York City, on March 25, 1911 a fire broke out in the Triangle Factory and killed 146 workers. Unfortunately many of the women working in the Factory were Italian and European Jewish immigrants coming to the U.S. to find peace. Within 18 minutes of the fire, 146 people were dead. 25 young women threw themselves down elevator shafts trying to escape. The water streams from hoses could not reach the 7th floor. 19 bodies were found fried against locked doors. 25 bodies were found bundled in the cloakroom. “The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire of 1911 would change the regulation by government of business. Before the fire government had mostly stayed away from business feeling it had no power to legislate it (CSUN).” Groups like International Ladies Garment Workers Union and Women’s Trade Union League fought for better working conditions. Innovation changed the way factories were build. Innovation made safer working conditions.
Sweatshops before 1911 were easily described by low wages, long hours, and dangerous working conditions. Max Blanck and Isaac Harris owned the Asch building. Blanck and Harris had a “personal business.” Sadly, factory was in the hands of workers who did not follow through with workers rights and forced unsafe working conditions. They could treat workers however they wanted to without being punished. Owners hired people to pick workers and pocket a portion of the profits. The subcontractors could pay the workers whatever they felt like. A few weeks before the fire, workers had been forgotten in Americas industrial machine. After the fire, communication allowed for a better future interaction between the worker and the boss.
After the fire, workers went to Union quarters to demand Harris and Blanck be brought to trial. “Role that strong unions could have in helping prevent tragedies became clear. Workers organized in Unions would be more aware of their rights and ability to obtain safe working conditions. (Cornell).” Many organizations came together to help families cope. Executive board members of Ladies Waist and Dress Makers union met to plan relief for survivors and families of the fire. The Joint Relief Committee came together with American Red Cross and provided 30, 000 dollars. The fire persuaded people with power to take action against the dangerous practices in the factories.
“If you ask the average American worker, ‘“Is it okay for workers to work in a shop where the conditions are so dangerous that it could cost them their lives and not have government intervene,”’ most people would say ‘“No. There’s a line.’” The Triangle Fire drew that line. It burned that line, really, into the nation’s conscience (Annelise Orleck).” State and federal laws were put in place because of this. Unions gained workers who wanted to fight for their safety. Collaboration that instance combined with a few smaller situations made a big enough statement that something had to be done to protect the workforce.

The Factory Fire killed a ton of people because owners locked their workers in until the day was over. When the fire happened they could not get out. This fire made the world realize that the work force needed safety laws. It put work safety laws in motion that are still used today.


JWA-Triangle Shirtwaist Fire
I found this site the least helpful. I did not use it as much as the other sources. It did not have much information on what I was looking for. Just the Jewish views.

This source was helpful, yet I did not use it as much as the last three sources. There was to much information compacted into one big paper, that continued to go on and on about the same thing.
I used CSUN to get an exact number of deaths during the fire. This website provided me with the exact number of bodies found and people that jumped.
This is the most credible site. The video provided me with a visual aspect of it all. This was my favorite because I am a visual learner.
This source was also very precise and credible! It separated each aspect of the fire into a different category which made it easier to learn.

Cornell- Remembering The 1911 Triangle Factory Fire
This source provided me with information no other website provided. It talked about the mourning and protest after the fire, relief work, and investigation and trial. This source went above and beyond.

This image shows the Factory before the fire
This is a newspaper article talking about fire